Previous document

Next document

gri_2003_m_46_b04_f21_016

Transcribers

  1. 67415763 - ethomson
  2. 67496804 - Preacher357
  3. 68086474 - JanetCormack
  4. 68295116 - jesseytucker
  5. 68489369 - elle67
  6. WINNER - 68572103 - SusanMorley53425

67415763 - ethomson

Pete 8.9.51
Dearest Lawrence,
What a pleasure it was to open
Art News and to find so erudite an
article by Lionel - he is a splendid
critic - very much for the "cognoscenti"
(is that how it's spelt?!) though. I see
also R-B's article on Hampstead
artists. On the whole he is right -
but if he were going to mention Venus
and Beaumont he ought to have
mentioned Madeleine and me!
I will write to Muriel and suggest
one of your lectures days - not Banstead,
and just go for tea. I am very
sorry that you will miss the I.C.A.
discussion - what a pity. I presume
that you did not go to the
Growth and form discussions?
I'm sorry to have been so muddled
with days and dates. I
can't think what month I

67496804 - Preacher357

8-9-51 Pett Dearest Lawrence,
What a pleasure it was to open
Art News and to find so an
article by Lional - he is a spendid
critic - very much for the "cognocent",
(is that how it's spelt?!) though. I see
also R-B's article on Hampstead
. On the whole he is right -
but if he were going to mention Venus
and Beanmont he ought to have
mentioned Madelaine and me!
I will write to Muriel and suggest
one of your lecture days - not Banstead,
and just go for tea. I am very
sorry that you will miss the I.C.A.
discussion - what a pity. I presume
that you did not go to the
growth and form disenssion?
I'm sorry to have been so muddled
with days and dates. I
can't think what mouth I

68086474 - JanetCormack

Pett 8.9.51
Dearest Lawrence,
What a pleasure it was to open Art News and to find so erudite an article by Lionel - he is a splendid critic - very much for the "cognoscenti" (is that how it's spelt?!) though. I see also R-B's article on Hampstead artists. On the whole he is right but if he were going to mention Venus and Beaumont he ought to have mentioned Madelaine and me!
I will write to Muriel and suggest one of your lecture days - not Banstead, and just go for tea. I am very sorry that you will miss the I.C.A. discussions - what a pity. I presume that you did not go to the Growth and Form discussion?
I'm sorry to have been so muddled with days and dates. I can't think what month I

68295116 - jesseytucker

Pett 8.9.51

Dearest Lawrence,
What a pleasure it was to open
Art News and to find so erudite an
article by Lionel--he is a splendid
critic--very uch for the "cognecent"
(is that how it's spelt?!) though. I see
also R-B's article on Hampstead
artists. On the whole he is right--
but if he were going to mention Venus
and Beaumont he ought to have
mentioned Madelaine and me!
I will write to Muriel and suggest
one of your lecture days--not Banstead,
and just go for tea. I am very
sorry that you will miss the ICA
discussion--what a pity. I presume
that you did not go to the
growth and form disenssion?
I'm sorry to have been so muddled
with days and dates. I
can't think what mouth I

68489369 - elle67

Pelt 8.9.51
Dearest Lawrence
What a pleasure it was to open Art News and to find so erudite an article by Lionel - he is a splendid critic - very much for the"cognosciuti" (is that how it's spelt?!) though I see also R-B's article on Hampstead artists. On the whole he is right - but if he were going to mention Venus and Beaumont he ought to have mentioned Madelaine and me!
I will write to Muriel and suggest one of your lecture days - not Bamstead, and just go for tea. I am very sorry that you will miss the I.O.A. discussion - what a pity. I presume that you did not go to the growth and form discussion?
I'm sorry to have been so muddled with days and dates. I cant think what month I

WINNER - 68572103 - SusanMorley53425

Pett 8.9.51

Dearest Lawrence,
What a pleasure it was to open
Art News and to find so erudite an
article by Lionel - he is a splendid
critic - very much for the "cognoscent",
(is that how it's spelt?!) though. I see
also R-B's article on Hampstead
artists. On the whole he is right -
but if he were going to mention Venus
and Beaumont he ought to have
mentioned Madelaine and me!
I will write to Muriel and suggest#one of your lecture days - not Banstead,
and just go for tea. I am very
sorry that you will miss the I.C.A.
discussion - what a pity. I presume
that you did not go to the
Growth and Form discussion ?
I'm sorry to have been so muddled
with days and dates. I
can't think what month I

Previous document

Next document