gri_2003_m_46_b05_f12_018
- Max. dissimilarity: 0.068
- Mean dissimilarity: 0.038
- Image votes: 0.0
Transcribers
- 68656243 - Preacher357
- 69153595 - jesseytucker
- WINNER - 69427716 - not-logged-in-8362141ab146ef8d3c81
- 70191120 - JanetCormack
- 70537293 - ethomson
- 70958973 - Zooniverse2017
68656243 - Preacher357
This is not one of the works on which Griffith's great re-putation rests. Nevertheless it is not the work of a hack.
The handling has a straightforwardness and lack of ostentation
which is expressive. The discriminating and economical comp-
osition of every scene cannot fail to impress the spectater.
We have in fact that familiar phenomenon of the movies - a re-
markable technical authority lavished on a subject-matter design-
ed for the comfort of morons. It is like most of the films of
John Ford - a beautiful piece of nothing. The simpliciity and
certainty of Griffith's technique requires a serious theme: as
it is the novelettish material constantly betrays him.
This combination of brilliant 'means' and foolish 'end' leaves
one, not as I suppose Griffith intended, with a heartening view
of the world, but with a detached aesthetic interest in manner
alone.
69153595 - jesseytucker
This is not one of the works on which Griffith's great re-putation rests. Nevertheless it is not the work of a hack.
The handling has a straightforwardness and lack of ostentation
which is expressive. The discriminating and economical comp-
osition of every scene cannot fail to impress the spectator
We have in fact that familiar phenomenon of the movies--& re-
markable technical authority lavished on a subject-matter design-
ed for the comfort of morons. It is like most of the films of
John Ford--a beautiful piece of nothing. The simplicity and
certainty of Griffith's technique require a serious theme: as
it is the novelettish material constantly betrays him.
This combination of a brilliant 'means' of foolish 'end' leaves
one, not as I suppose Griffith intended, with a heartening view
of the world, but with a detached aesthetic interest in manner
alone.
WINNER - 69427716 - not-logged-in-8362141ab146ef8d3c81
This is not one of the works on which Griffith's great re-putation rests. Nevertheless it is not the work of a hack.
The handling has a straightforwardness and lack of ostentation
which is expressive. The discriminating and economical comp-
osition of every scene cannot fail to impress the spectator.
We have in fact that familiar phenomenon of the movies - a re-
markable technical authority lavished on a subject-matter design-
ed for the comfort of morons. It is like most of the films of
John Ford - a beautiful piece of nothing. The simplicity and
certainty of Griffith's technique require a serious theme: as
it is the novelettish material constantly betrays him.
This combination of brilliant 'means' and foolish 'end' leaves
one, not as I suppose Griffith intended, with a heartening view
of the world, but with a detached aesthetic interest in manner
alone.
70191120 - JanetCormack
This is not one of the works on which Griffith's great reputation rests. Nevertheless it is not the work of a hack. The handling has a straightforwardness and lack of ostenation which is expressive. The discriminating and economical composition of every scene cannot fail to impress the spectator. We have in fact the familiar phenomenon of the movies - a remarkable technical authority lavished on a subject-matter designed for the comfort of morons. It is like most of the films of John Ford - a beautiful piece of nothing. The simplicity and certainty of Griffith's technique requires a serious theme: as it is the novelettish material constantly betrays him. This combination of brilliant 'means' and foolish end leaves one, not as I suppose Griffith intended, with a heartening view of the world, but with a detached aesthetic interest in manner alone.70537293 - ethomson
This is not one of the works on which Griffith's great re-putation rests. Nevertheless it is not the work of a hack.
The handling has a straightforwardness and lack of ostentation
which is expressive. The discriminating and economical comp-
osition of every scene cannot fail to impress the spectator.
We have in fact that familiar phenomenon of the movies - a re-
markable technical authority lavished on a subject-matter design-
ed for the comfort of morons. It is like most of the films of
John Ford - a beautiful piece of nothing. The simplicity and
certainty of Griffith's technique require a serious theme: as
it is the novelettish material constantly betrays him.
This combination of brilliant 'means' and foolish 'end' leaves
one, not as I suppose Griffith intended, with a heartening view
of the world, but with a detached aesthetic interest in manner
alone.
70958973 - Zooniverse2017
This is not one of the works on which Griffith's great re-putation rests. Nevertheless it is not the work of a hack.
The handling has a straightforwardness and lack of ostentation
which is expressive. The discriminating and economical comp-
osition of every scene cannot fail to impress the spectator.
We have in fact that familiar phenomenom of the movies - a re-
markable technical authority lavished on a subject-matter design-
ed for the comfort of morons. It is like most of the films of
John Ford - beautiful piece of nothing. The simplicity and
certainty of Griffith's technique requires a serious theme; as
it is the novelettish material constantly betrays him.
This combination of brilliant 'means' and foolish 'end' leaves
one, not as I suppose Griffith intended, with a heartening view
of the world, but with a detached aesthetic interest in manner
alone.