gri_2003_m_46_b01_f05_041
- Max. dissimilarity: 1.0
- Mean dissimilarity: 0.458
- Image votes: 0.0
Transcribers
- 65318351 - not-logged-in-c8be287e2f14b21fc964
- WINNER - 65362393 - Africatraveler
- 65363546 - vanderfb
- 65367032 - judilyn540
- 65376498 - not-logged-in-b79d3a54c86f141ef30f
65318351 - not-logged-in-c8be287e2f14b21fc964
WINNER - 65362393 - Africatraveler
iiThe book you mention on the English court would be a delight though I do see a vast amount of work as being necessary and a most expensive number of trips to private collections - [Chatsworth] is only one that comes to mind. Also, I like very well the suggested political conclusions and I wonder, here, how far we would agree - just how far you would agree to come with me toward total monarchy's attitude toward the masses. And even an implicit condemnation of our present stolid, boring Royal Family for being 'above suspicion'. What [dawning] vistas of ideas are opened by your suggestion. We should have to try and get one of the 45 suites at Hampton Court to write it in, I think.
Yesterday I went to London for the first time for weeks and saw Fuseli again, Sutherland's new work, and David Jones' new collection of which I enclose one illustration, all I could get.
The reason by the way for this [enforced] absence from town is one I must now tell you. I had not committed it to paper before because I did not want you to
65363546 - vanderfb
iiThe book you mention on the English court would be a delight though I do see a vast amount of work as being necessary and a most expensive number of trips to private collections - Chatsworth is only one that comes to mind. Also I like very well the 'suggested political conclusions' and I wonder, here, how far we would agree - just how far you would agree to come with me toward total monarchy's attitude toward the masses. And even an implicit condemnation of our present stolid, boring Royal Family for being 'Above Suspicion'. What charming visitor of ideas are opened by your suggestion. We should have to try and get one of the 45 suites at Hampton Court to write it in, I think.
Yesterday I went to London for the first time for weeks and saw Fuseli again, Estherland's new work, and Daniel Jones' new collection of which I enclose one illustration, all I could get.
The reason by the way for this enforced absence from town is one I must now tell you. I had not committed it to paper before because I did not want you to
65367032 - judilyn540
iiThe book you mention on the English count would be a delight, though I do see a vast amount of work as being necessary and a most expensive number of trips to private collections - Chatsworth is only one that comes to mind. I like very well the suggested political conclusions and I wonder, here, how far we would agree - just how far you would agree to come with me toward total monarchy's attitude, toward the masses. And even an implicit condemnation of our present stolid, boring royal family for being 'above suspicion'. What charming vistas of ideas are opened by your suggestion. We should have to try and get one of the 45 suites at Hampton Court to write it in, I think.
Yesterday I went to London for the first time for weeks and saw Fuzeli again, Sotherland's new work and David Jones' new collection of which I enclose one illustration, all I could get.
The reason by the way for this enforced absence from town is one I must now tell you. I had not committed it to paper before because I did not want you to
65376498 - not-logged-in-b79d3a54c86f141ef30f
iiThe book you mention on the English court would be a delight thought I do see a vast amount of work as being necessary and a most expensive num-
ber of trips to private collections - Chats-
worth is only one that comes to mind.
Also I like very well the 'suggested polit-
ical conclusions' and I wonder, here, how far we would agree - just how far you would agree to come with me to-
ward total monarch's attitude to-
ward the masses. And even on implicit condemnation of our present stolid doing Royal Family for being 'above suspicion'. What charming vistas of ideas are opened by your suggestion. We should love to try and get one of the 45 suites at Hampton Court to write it in, I think.
Yesterday I went to London for the first time for weeks and saw Fuzeli again, Sutherland's new work, and David Jones' new collection of which I enclose one illustration, all I could get.
The reason why all way for this enforced absence from them is one I must now tell you. I had not committed it to paper before because I did not want you to