gri_2003_m_46_b04_f20_020
- Max. dissimilarity: 0.163
- Mean dissimilarity: 0.111
- Image votes: 0.0
Transcribers
- WINNER - 66720627 - ethomson
- 66963620 - Preacher357
- 67164577 - DanelD
- 67435675 - nzanga
- 67768360 - jsprake
- 67803732 - RommelC

WINNER - 66720627 - ethomson
Pete 18 . 8 . 51Dearest Lawrence,
Thank you for your delightful drawing
but I must admit the tone of
your letter does not cheer me at all.
You seem far too casual. I must not
fuss though as I have already told
you my views on the subject and
either you agree with me or I
may as well not trouble you. I
think it would be very foolish
not to try for the N.G. You
are known there and you know
plenty of people who would sponsor
you without Charles. Lines, Gibson
J. Cox; Sir Osbert Sitwell the Art Council
the W.E.A. anyway do try - your
knowledge of the collection would
make up for the languages I think
and how convenient it would be for
you - you would only lose 2 1/2 d.
and you need not tell Charles you
66963620 - Preacher357
18-8-51 Pett Dearest Lawrence,Thank you for your delightful drawing
but I must admit the tone of
your letter does not cheer me at all.
You seem far too casual. I must'nt
fuss though as I have already told
you my views on the subject and
either you agree with me or I
may as well not touble you. I
think it would be very foolish
not to try for the N.G. you
are known there and you know
plenty of people who would sponser
you without Charles. Lines, Gibson
T. Cox; Sir Osbot Sitwell, the Art
the W.E.A. anyway do try - your
knowledge of the collection would
make up for the languages I think,
and how convenient it would be for
you - you would only lose 2 1/2d.
and you need not tell Charles you
67164577 - DanelD
Dearest Lawrence,Thank you for your delightful drawing
but I must think the tone of
your letter does not cheer me at all.
You seem for too casual. I must'nt
fuss though as I have already told
you my views on the subject and
either you agree with me or I
may as well not trouble you. I
think it would be very foolish
not to try for the N.G. You
are known there and you know
plenty of people who would sponsor
you without Charles. Lines, Gibson
T. Cox, Sir Ostat sit well the Art Council
the W.E.A. Anyway do try - your
knowledge of the collection would
make up for the CanpnagesIthink
and how can convenient it would be for
you. You would only lose 2 1/2 d
and you need not tell Charles your
67435675 - nzanga
Dearest Lawrence,Thank you for your delightful drawing but I must admit the tone of your letter does not cheer me at all. You seem far too casual. I mustn't fuss though as I have already told you my views on the subject and either you agree with me or I may as well not trouble you. I think it would be very foolish not to try for the N.G. you are known there and you know plenty of people who would sponsor you without Charles. Lines, Gibson J. Cox; Sir Osbert Sitwell the Art Comm the W.E.A. anyway do try - your knowledge of the collection would make up for the languages I think and how convenient it would be for you- You would only lose 2 1/2 d. and you need not tell Charles you
67768360 - jsprake
Pett18.8.51
Dearest Lawrence,
Thank you for your delightful drawing
but I must admit the tone of
your letter does not cheer me at all.
You seem far too casual. I mustn't
fuss though as I have already told
you my views on the subject and
either you agree with me or I
may as well not trouble you. I
think it would be very foolish
not to try for the N.G. you
are known there and you know
plenty of people who would sponsor
you without Charles. Limes, Gibson
T. Cox; Sir Osbert Sitwell the Art Council
the W.E.A. Anyway do try - your
knowledge of the collection would
make up for the I think
and how convenient it would be for
you - You would only lose 2 1/2 d.
and you need not tell Charles you
67803732 - RommelC
Pett 18.8.51Dearest Lawrence,
Thank you for your delightful drawing but I must admit the tone of you letter does not cheer me at all. You seem far too casual. I mustn't fuss though as I have already told you my views on the subject and either you agree with me or I may as well not trouble you. I think it would be very foolish not to try for the N.G. You are known there and you know plenty of people who wold sponsor you without Charles. Lines, Gibson J. Cox; Sir Osbot Sitwell the Art Council the W.E.A. anyway do try- your knowledge of the collection would make up for the languages I think and how convenient it would be for you- You would only lose 2 1/2 d. and you need not tell Charles you