Previous document

Next document

gri_2003_m_46_b04_f21_007

Transcribers

  1. 66523567 - Preacher357
  2. 66651703 - tmeconverse
  3. 67403399 - Moonlightress
  4. WINNER - 68128835 - hoskinml
  5. 68327795 - jesseytucker
  6. 68420551 - Berhel

66523567 - Preacher357

5-9-51 Pett Dearest Lawrence
Thank you for your letter. I
now enclose your chapter. Tiny
has read it and thinks it excellent.
She has two criticisms which
I think useful. Both in the last
half of the 1st paragraph.
"These buildings are Formidable examples
of the Perpendicular" Tiny says
"why Formidable?" She knows
these building's does not quite
see why the term should be applied
to them. I am inclined to agree
with her, I think you are probably
being a little (?spelling!)
then in the following sentence you
go on to discuss domestic buildings
in such a way as to suggest
that the Perpendicular style is not
gothic - I don't think you mean
this though Tiny and I are agreed
there is a Transiyional style.

66651703 - tmeconverse

Pett 5.9.51

Dearest Lawrence
Thank you for your letter. I now enclose your chapter. Tiny has read it and thinks it excellent. She has two criticisms which I think useful. Both in the last half of the 1st paragraph.
"These buildings are Formidable examples of the Perpendicular" Tiny says "Why Formidable?" She knows these buildings and does not quite see why the term should be applied to them. I am inclined to agree with her. I think you are probably being a little quiloquil (?spelling!) then in the following sentence you go on to discus domestic buildings in such a way as to suggest that the Perpendicular style is not Gothic. I don't think you mean this though Tiny and I are agreed that it is a transitional style.

67403399 - Moonlightress

Pett
15-9-51
Dearest Lawrence

Thank you for your letter. I now enclose your chapter. has read it and thinks it excellent. She has two criticisms which I think useful. Both in the last half of the 1st paragraph.

"These buildings are Formidable examples of the Perpendicular" says "Why Formidable?" She knows these building and does not quite see why the term should be applied to them. I am inclined to agree with her, I think you are probably being a little queloloquil (?spelling!) then in the following sentence you go on to discuss domestic buildings in such a way as to suggest that the Perpendicular style is not gothic - I don't think you mean this though and I are agreed that it is a Transitional style.

WINNER - 68128835 - hoskinml

Pett 5.9.51
Dearest Lawrence
Thank you for your letter. I now enclose your chapter. Tiny has read it and thinks it excellent. She has two criticisms which I think useful. Both in the last half of the 1st paragraph.
"These buildings are Formidable examples of the Perpendicular" Tiny says "Why Formidable?" She knows these buildings and does not quite see why the term should be applied to them. I am inclined to agree with her, I think you are probably being a little quilologuil (?spelling!) then in the following sentence you go on to discuss domestic buildings in such a way as to suggest that the Perpendicular Style is not Gothic - I don't think you mean this though Tiny and I are agreed that it is a transitional style.

68327795 - jesseytucker

Pett 5.9.51

Dearest Lawrence,
Thank you for your letter. I
new enclose your chapter. Tiny
has read it and thinks it excellent.
She has two critiques which
I think useful. Both in the last
half of the 1st paragraph.
"These buildings are formidable examples
of the perpendicular" Tiny says
"why formidable?" She knows
these buildings and does not quite
see why the term should be applied
to them. I am inclined to agree
with her. I think you are probably
being a little quiloloquil (?spelling!)
then in the following sentence you
go on to discuss domestic buildings
in such a way as to suggest
that the perpendicular style is not
Gothic. I don't think you mean
this though Tiny and I are agreed
that it is a Transitional style.

68420551 - Berhel

Pett

15-9-51

Dearest Lawrence,

Thank you for your letter. I now enclose your chapter. Tiny has read it and thinks it excellent. She has two criticisms which I think useful. Both in the last half of the 1st paragraph.

"These buildings are Formidable example of the Perpendicular" Tiny says "why Formidable?" She knows these buildings and does not quite see why the term should be applied to them. I am inclined to agree with her, I think you are probably being a little then in the following sentence you go on to discuss domestic buildings in such a way, as to suggest that the Perpendicular style is not gothic - I don't think you mean this though Tiny and I are agreed that it is a Transitional style.

Previous document

Next document