gri_2003_m_46_b05_f09_010
- Max. dissimilarity: 0.197
- Mean dissimilarity: 0.131
- Image votes: 0.0
Transcribers
- WINNER - 69107178 - JanetCormack
- 69839040 - gailkoelker
- 70173973 - slartybartfast100
- 70797298 - Moggsy8
- 71265211 - highc51239
- 71763647 - racjohn
WINNER - 69107178 - JanetCormack
Blackheath 13 IX 52Dearest Sylvia
Thank you for your stimulating and loving letter. It makes me very happy. How kind of you to send me Horizon so soon - and Masson: thank you, dearest love.
I was interested in C's reasons for disliking Auden. I quite see that he preaches, and so does Eliot, so does Greene. But do Montherlant and Maurier really only state? Surely both these writers fix things to justify their own attitudes? Surely they only decide on the destiny of their characters, and so on, to express an attitude. I think the test is not objectivity versus preaching but whether form and content suit each other: not whether the content is legitimate outside the form but if it suits the form. By this test Auden at his best seems to me good. The content of Limestone is ridiculous: its relation to form exquisite. (That is my present view though I acknowledge the pressures which cause one to take sides.)
Delighted that Armida progresses so well. Admirable: I am pleased. (I read the Nicholson article in the Burlington Magazine at breakfast (because you said you had read it): I agree it is disjointed - but what a nice frontispiece, don't you think?) I long to see R and A again. It is a tradition which starts in the South, comes North (to the frontispiece, e.g.), then is southernised again in the Roccoco.
My film book goes very well. I have written a 1000 words, at least, on Dreamboat which I saw yesterday. In fact I probably should not have gone to the cinema yesterday - nor worked on my lectures at the Tate Gallery as long as I did, for my glands have swollen again. However, Dreamboat is excellent: you should certainly see it. Kiss Me Kate was very enjoyable, also - quite well handled by a Touring Co. with Chris. Hewett (of the Watergate Review) in the lead.
What marvellous news about yet another American letter of praise for the Rector. I know ow much C admires Ellis, too. Do congratulate him for me. I am sorry Haine is little better: how extraordinary about New Zealand. I am disgusted with that ridiculous place.
Lion is gradually collecting material for the Sex Lecture (I seem I am in a What's On advertisement for the Sex Ed. Soc!), not all of which I may use, but I would like a margin. Something we left out was a case history or two of particular artists: I shall try and work on in (Hogarth, Nijinsky, Leonardo - I don't know who yet), {how about The Psychopathology of Dame Laura Knight?]
Lincoln Girls' School mistake me for Superman. They want 3 lectures in the morning: in the afternoon I introduce 5 art films; in the evening another lecture. However no duties on Saturday to speak of & I shall get lb15.
The Nov. Athene progresses well: even the "May" one advances.
Do not worry about me. My glands will go down again over the weekend - certainly by the time you read this on Monday. I shall do my work in a semi-horizontal postiion: LION as recumbent-reader. I shall not give up any more lectures as long as I still have a chin!
I adore you sweetheart
I adore you
Lawrence
69839040 - gailkoelker
Blackheath 13 ix 52Dearest Sylvia
Thank you for your stimulating and loving letter. It makes me very happy. How kind of you to send me Horizon so soon: and Masson: thank you, dearest love.
I was interested in C's reasons for disliking Auden. I quite see that he preaches, and so does Eliot, so does Greene. But do Monthes lant and Mauriac really only state? Surely both these writers fix things to justify their own attitudes? Surely they decide on the destiny of their characters, and so on, to express an attitude. I think the test is not objectivity versus preaching but whether form and content suit each other: not whether the content is legitimate outside the form but if it suits the form. By this test Auden at his best seems to me good. The content of Limestone is ridiculous: its relation to the form exquisite. (That is my present view though I acknowledge the pressures which cause one to take sides).
Delighted that Armido progresses so well. Admirable. I am pleased. (I read the Nicholson article in the Burl. Mag. at breakfast (because you said you had read it): I agree it is disjointed-but what a nice frontispiece, don't you think?) I long to see R and A again. It is in a tradition which starts in the south, cover north (to the frontispiece, e.g.), then is southernised again in the rococo.
My film book goes very well. I have written a 1000 words, act least, on Dreamboat which I saw yesterday. In fact I probably should not have gone to the cinema yesterday-nor worked on my lecture at the Tate Gallery as long as I did for my glands have swollen again. However, Dreamboat is excellent: you should certainly see it. Kiss Me Kate was very enjoyable, also-quite well handled by a touring co. with Chris Hewett (of the Watergate Review) in the lead.
What marvelous news about yet another American letter of praise for the Rector. I know how much I admired Ellis, too. Do congratulate him for me. I am sorry Haire is little better=how extra-ordinary about New Zealand. I am disgusted with that ridiculous place.
Lion is gradually collecting material for the sex lecture ( I see I am in a What's On advertisement for the Sex. Ed. Soc.!) not all of which I may use, but I would like a margin. Something we left out was a case history or two of particular artists: I shall try to work one in (Hogarth, Nijinski, Leonardo-I don't know who yet) [how about the Psychopathology of Domelanna Knight?]
Lincoln Girls' School mistake me for superman. They want 3 lectures in the morning: in the afternoon I introduce 5 art films: in the evening another lecture. However no duties on Saturday to speak of and I shall get 15.
The Nov. Athene progresses well=even the "nay" one advances.
Do not worry about me. My glands will go down again over the weekend-certainly by the time you read this on Monday. I shall do my work in a semi-horizontal position: LION as recumbent-reader. I shall not give up any more lectures as long as I still have a chin!
I adore you sweetheart.
I love you
Lawrence
70173973 - slartybartfast100
Blackheath13 1X 52
Dearest Sylvia
Thank you for your stimulating and loving letter. It makes me very happy. How kind of you the send me Horizon so soon - and Masson: thank you, dearest love.
I was interested in C's reason for disliking Auden. I quite see that he preaches, and so does Eliot, so does Greeve. But do and really only state? Surely both these writers fix things to justify their own attitudes? Surely they decide on the destiny of their characters, and so on, to express an attitude. I think the test is not objectivity versus preaching but whether form and content suit each other: not whether the content is legitimate outside the form but if it suits the form. By this test Auden at his best seems to me good. The content of Limestone is : its relation to the form exquisite. (That is my present view though I acknowledge the pressures which cause one to take sides.)
Delighted that progresses so well. Admirable. I am pleased. (I read the Nicholson article in the Burl. Mag at breakfast (because you said you had read it): I agree it is disjointed - but what a nice piece, don't you think?) I long to see R and A again. It is in a tradition which starts in the South, comes North (to the , e.g.), then is south - again in the rococo..
My film book goes well. I have written a 1000 words, at least, on Dreamboat which I saw yesterday. In fact I probably should not have gone to the cinema yesterday - nor worked on my lecture for the Tate Gal-lery as long as I did, my glands have swollen again. However, Dreamboat is excellent: you should certainly see it. Kiss Me Kate was very enjoyable, also - quite well handled by a Touring Co. with Chris. Herriott (of the Watergate Review) in the lead.
What marvellous news about yet another American letter of praise for the Rectors. I know how much C admires Ellis, too. Do congratulate him for me. I am sorry Haine is little better: how extra-ordinary about New Zealand. I am disgusted with that ridiculous place.
Lion is gradually collecting material for the Sex Lecture (I see I am in a What's On advertisement for the Sex Ed. Soc.!) not all of which I may use, but I would like a margin. Something we left out was a case history of two particular artists: (Hogart's, Nijinsky, Leonando, I don't know who yet). (How about the Psychopathology of Knight?)
Lincoln Girls' School mistakes me for superman. They want 3 lectures in the morning; in the afternoon I introduce 5 and films; in the evening another lecture. However no duties on Saturday to speak of & I shall get lb15.
T6 Nov.Athene progresses well: even the "" one advances.
Do not worry about me. My glands will go down again over the weekend -I'm thinking by the time you read this on Monday. I shall do my work in a semi - horiz-ontal position: LION as recumbent reader. I shall not give up any more lec-tures as long as I still have a Chin claim!
I adore you sweetheart,
adore you
Lawrence
70797298 - Moggsy8
Blackheath 13 IX 52Dearest Sylvia
Thank you for your stimulating and loving letter. It makes me very happy. How kind of you to send me Horizon so soon - and Masson: thank you, dearest love.
I was interested in C's reasons for disliking Auden. I quite see that he preaches, and so does Eliot, so does Greene. But do Montherlant and Mauriac really only state? Surely both these writers fix things to justify their own attitudes? Surely they decide on the destiny of their characters, and so on, to express an attitude. I think the test is not objectivity versus preaching but whether form and content suit each other: not whether the content is legitimate outside the form but if it suits the form. By this test Auden at his best seems to me good. The content of Limestone is ridiculous: its relation to form exquisite. (That is my present view though I acknowledge the pressures that make one take sides.)
Delighted that Armide progresses so well. Admirable, I am pleased. (I read the Nicholson article in the Burl. Mag. at breakfast (because you said you had read it): I agree it is disjointed - but what a nice frontispiece, don't you think?) I long to see R and A again. It is in a tradition which starts in the South, comes North (to the frontispiece e.g.), then is southernised again in the rococo.
My film book goes very well. I have written 1000 words, at least, on Dreamboat which I saw yesterday. In fact I probably should not have gone to the cinema yesterday - nor. worked on my lectures at the Tate Gallery as long as I did, for my glands have swollen again. However, Dreamboat is excellent: you should certainly see it. Kiss Me Kate was very enjoyable, also - quite well handled by a Touring Co. with Chris Hemett (of the Watergate Review) in the lead.
What marvelous news about yet another American letter of praise for the Rector. I know how much C admires Ellis, too. Do congratulate him for me. I an sorry Haire is little better: how extraordinary about New Zealand. I am disgusted about that ridiculous place.
Lion is gradually collecting material for the sex lecture (I see I am in a What's On advertisement for the Sex. Ed. Soc.!), not all of which I may use, but I would like a margin. Something we left out was a case history or two of particular artists: I shall try and work one in (Hogarth, Nijinsky, Leonardo. I don't know who yet.) [How about The Psychopathology of Dame Laura Knight?]
Lincoln Girl's school mistake me for Superman. They want 3 lectures in the morning: in the afternoon I introduce 5 art films; in the evening another lecture. However on Saturday no duties to speak of & I shall get $15.
The Nov. Athene progresses well: even the "May" one advances.
Do not worry about me. My glands will go down again over the weekend - certainly by the time you read this on Monday. I shall do my work in a semi-horizontal position: Lion as recumbent - reader. I shall not give up any more lectures as long as I still have chin!
I adore you sweetheart, I adore you
Lawrence
71265211 - highc51239
Blackheath 13 1x 52Dearest Sylvia
Thank you for your stimulating and loving letter. It makes me very happy. How kind of you to send me Horizon so soon - masson: thank you, dearest love.
I was interested in C's reasons for disliking Sweden. I quite see that he meades , and so does Eliot, so does greene. But do months lant and mauriac really only state? Surely both these writers fix things to justify their own attitudes? Surely they decide on the destiny of their characters and so on, to express an attitude. I think the test is not objectivity versus preaching but whether form and content suit each other; not whether the content is legitimate outside the form but if it suits a form. By this test suden at his best seems to me good. The content of limestone is ridiculous: its relation to the form exquisite. (That is my present view though I acknowledge the pressures which cause one to take sides.)
Delighted that armido progresses so well. Admirable; I am leased (I read the Nidalsa article in the Bush.Mag at breakfast (because you said you had read it) I agree it is disjointed - but what a nice frontispiece, don't you think?) I long to see R and A again. It is in a tradition which starts in the south, comes North (to the frontespiece, e.g) then is south ernised again in the rococo.
My film book goes very we.. I have written a 1000 words, at least, on Dreamboat which I saw yesterday. In fact I probably should not have gone to the cinema yesterday - nor worked on my lectures at the Tate gallery as long as I did, for my glands have swollen again. However, Dreamboat is excellent; you should certainly see it. Kiss Me Kate was very enjoyable, also - quite well handles by a Touring Co. with Chris Hewett (of the Watergate Review) in the lead.
What marvellous news about yet another american letter of praise for the Rector. I know how much C admire Ellis, too. Do congratulate him for me. I am sorry Kaine is little better; how extraordinary about New Zealand. I am disgusted with that ridiculous place.
Lion is gradually collecting material for the six lecture (I see I am in a weats Om advertisement for the sen.Ed.Soc!), not all of which I may use, but I would like a margin. Something we left out was a case history or two of particular artists; I shall try and work one in (Kogarth, Nijinsky, Leonardo. I don't know who yet). (How about the Psychopathology of Dametamia Knight?)
Lincoln girls' School mistakes me for superman. They want 3 lectures in the morning; in the afternoon I introduce 5 art films; in the evening another lecture. However no duties on Saturday to speak of & I shall get 15(pounds).
TG Nov. Athene progresses well, even the "may" one advances.
Do not worry about me. My glands may go down again over the weekend - certainly by the time you read this on Monday. I shall do my work in a semi-boring-ontal position = Lion as recumbent - reader. I shall not give up any more lectures as long as I still have a chin!
I adore you sweetheart, I adore you Lawrence.
71763647 - racjohn
Blackheath 13 1x 52Dearest Sylvia
Thank you for your stimulating and loving letter. It makes me very happy. How kind of you to send me Horigon - and Masson: thank you, dearest love.
I was interested in C's reasons for disliking Auden. I quite see that he preaches, and so does Eliot, so does Greene. But do Montherlant and Mauriac really only state? Surely both these writers fix things to justify their own attitudes? Surely they decide on the destiny of their characters, and so on, to express an attitude. I think the test is not objectivity versus preaching but whether form and content suit each other: not whether the content is legitimate outside the form but if it suits the form. By this test Auden at his best seems to me good. The content of Limestone is ridiculous: its relation to the form exquisite. (That is my present view through I acknowledge the pressures which cause one to take sides.)
Delighted that armido progresses so well. Admirable: I am pleased. (I read the Nicholson article in the Blue Mag at breakfast (because you said you had read it): I agree it is disjointed - but what a nice frontispiece, don't you think?) I long to see R and A again. It is in a tradition which starts in the South, comes North (to the frontispiece, e.g), then is southernised again in the rococo.
My film book goes very well. I have written a 1000 words, at least, on Dreamboat which I saw yesterday. In fact I probably should not have gone to the cinema yesterday - nor worked on my lecture at the Tate gallery as long as I did, for my glands have swollen again. However, Dreamboat is excellent: you should certainly see it. Kiss me Kate was very enjoyable, also - quite well handled by a Touring Co with chris hemmett (of the Watergate Review) in the lead.
What marvellous news about yet another American letter of praise for the Rector. I know how much C admires Ellis, too. Do congratulate him for me. I am sorry Haire is little better: how extra-ordinary about New Zealand. I am disgusted with that ridiculous place.
Lion is gradually collecting material for the Sex Lecture (I see I am in a Went's Own Advertisement for the Sex. Ed. Soc!), not all of which I may use, but I would like a margin. something we left out was a case history of two particular artists: I shall try and work one in (Hogarth, Nijinsky, Leonardo - I don't know who yet). [How about The Psychopathology of Dowelama Knight?]
Lincoln Girls' school mistake me for superman. They want 3 lectures in the morning: in the afternoon I introduce 5 art films; in the evening another lecture. However no duties on Saturday to speak of and I shall get lb15.
T6 Nov. Athens progresses well: even the "may" one advances.
Do not worry about me. My glands will go down again over the weekend - certainly by the time you read this on Monday. I shall do my work in a semi-horizontal position: LION as recumbent reader. I shall not give up any more lectures as long as I still have a chin!
I adore you sweetheart,
Adore you
Lawrence