gri_2003_m_46_b06_f05_025
- Max. dissimilarity: 0.104
- Mean dissimilarity: 0.053
- Image votes: 0.0
Transcribers
- 71805599 - not-logged-in-32a858b01795f20da552
- 71856100 - jesseytucker
- WINNER - 71973228 - the3esses
- 72374531 - ethomson
- 72641988 - Molly_Carr
- 72698106 - Preacher357
- 72761189 - altheist
71805599 - not-logged-in-32a858b01795f20da552
Blackheath [22-5-63]Friday evening
Dearest Sylvia:
Thank your for your story. Written at such speed and prompted as it was by negative reactions, I must say I think it is ex-
cellent. Especially I like the ways things go on while the characters speak: there is no unreal suspension during speech. You have 'caught' them, and the social milieu, very well. do agree with the Woods, however, that it has not quite been taken to the end. I ought to know: it's my idea.
My feelings are mixed: admiration for what you have written; rueful at your deflationary speed and crispness. You make me feel my idea was morbid and fancy and that what I had written was over-written (as it well may be). It is odd to see my idea differently handled, so that I am 'scooped' as well as criticised. My idea was not, as you seem to feel, aimed at us, however obliquely. Its genesis was different. I will write again when I have re-read the story and thought it over carefully.
Carter did not come last night but I spent a very pleasant evening with Magda and John. Definitely, however, I shall see Carter next week. I have another idea for an operetta, somewhere between Hemingway and Offenbach, in which it is like-
ly that Frank could be interested. That I could write straight. I think if I can write the proper things I can get work on TV and Sound. Magda as my agent, in effect.
Your visit to Rye with Beryl sounds enchanting (despite the behavior of the secretary of the Rye Artists).
My lectures have all gone rather nicely. The discussion at Hampstead was not too bad: I adopted an existentialist point of view towards art for the evening, as it was a discussion and I supposed liveliness was expected. I might just as well not have bothered. Nobody knew what I meant and Dennis and Freddie only said what they only too obviously believed in.
I have finished the Sutherland-Moore article. I am, at the moment, terribly pleased with it: I hope I've got Sutherland exactly. However, I may think differently when I see it in print next week. Christ but it was a rush.
If I am not to miss the 7.00 collection I must stop now, but you will get this before the week and if I go now. So, my darling, my beauty, I love you, I adore you, and am happy that we shall soon meet. I love love love you
Lawrence
71856100 - jesseytucker
BlackheathFriday evening
Dearest Sylvia:
Thank you for your story. Written at such speed and prompted
as it was by negative reactions, I must say I think it is ex-
cellent. Especially I like the ways things go on while the
characters speak: there is no unreal suspension during speech.
You have 'caught' them, and the social milieu, very well. I
do agree with the Woods, however, that it has not quite been
taken to the end. I ought to know: it's my idea.
My feelings are mixed: admiration for what you have written
rueful at your deflationary speed and crispness. You make me
feel my idea was morbid and fancy and that what I had written
was over-written (as it well may be). It is odd to see my
idea differently handled, so that I am 'scooped' as well as
criticised. My idea was not, as you seem to feel, aimed at
us, however obliquely. Its genesis was different. I will
write again when I have re-read the story and thought it over
carefully.
Carter did not come last night but I spent a very pleasant
evening with Magda and John. Definitely, however, I shall
see Carter next week. I have aother idea for an operetta,
somewhere between Hemingway and Offenbach, in which it is like-
ly that Frank could be interested. That I could write straight.
I think if I can write the proper things I can get work on
TV and Sound. Magda as my agent, in effect.
Your visit to Rye with Beryl sounds enchanting (despite the
behavior of the secretary of the Rye Artists).
My lectures have all gone rather nicely. The discussion at
Hampstead was not too bad: I adopted an existentialist point
of view towards art for the evening, as it was a discussion
and I supposed liveliness was expected. I might just as well
not have bothered. Nobody knew what I meant and Dennis and
Freddie only said what they only too obviously believed in.
I have finished the Sutherland-Moore article. I am, at the
moment, terribly please with it: I hope I've got Sutherland
exactly. However, I may think differently when I see it in
print next week. Christ but it was a rush.
If I am not to miss the 7.00 collection I must stop now, but
you will get this before the week end if I go now. So, my
darling, my beauty, I love you, I adore you, and am happy that
we shall soon meet. I love love love you.
Lawrence
WINNER - 71973228 - the3esses
22-5-53Blackheath
Friday Evening
Dearest Sylvia:
Thank you for your story. Written at such speed and prompted as it was by negative reactions, I must say I think it is excellent. Especially I like the way s things go on while the characters speak: there is no unreal suspension during speech. You have 'caught' them, and the social milieu, very well. I do agree with the Woods, however, that it has not quite been taken to the end. I ought to know: it's my idea.
My feelings are mixed: admiration for what you have written; rueful at your deflationary speed and crispness. You make me feel my idea was morbid and fancy and that what I had written was over-written (as it well may be). It is odd to see my idea differently handled, so that I am 'scooped' as well as criticised. My idea was not, as you seem to feel, aimed at us, however obliquely. Its genesis was different. I will write again when I have re-read the story and thought it over carefully.
Carter did not come last night but I spent a very pleasant evening with Magda and John. Definitely, however, I shall see Carter next week. I have another idea for an operetta, somewhere between Hemingway adn Offenbach, in which it is likely that Frank could be interested. That I could write straight. I think if I can write the proper things I can get work on TV and Sound. Magda as my agent, in effect.
Your visit to Rye with Beryl sounds enchanting (despite the behavior of the secretary of the Rye Artists).
My lectures have all gone rather nicely. The discussion at Hampstead was not too bad: I adopted an existentialist point of view towards art for the evening, as it was a discussion and I supposed livliness was expected. I might just as well not have bothered. Nobody knew what I meant and Dennis and Freddie only said what they only too obviously believed in.
I have finished the Sutherland-Moore article. I am, at the moment, terribly pleased with it: I hope I've got Sutherland exactly. However, I may think differently when I see it in print next week. Christ but it was a rush.
If I am not to miss the 7.00 collection I must stop now, but you will get this before the week end if I go now. So, my darling, my beauty, I love you, I adore you, and am happy that we shall soon meet. I love love love you
Lawrence
72374531 - ethomson
[22-5-53]Blackheath
Friday evening
Dearest Sylvia:
Thank you for your story. Written at such speed and prompted
as it was by negative reactions, I must say I think it is ex-
cellent. Especially I like the ways things go on while the
characters speak: there is no unreal suspension during speech.
You have 'caught' them, and the social milieu, very well. I
do agree with the Woods, however, that it has not quite been
taken to the end. I ought to know: it's my idea.
My feelings are mixed: admiration for what you have written;
rueful at your deflationary speed and crispness. You make me
feel my idea was morbid and fancy and that what I had written
was over-written (as it may well be). It is odd to see my
idea differently handled, so that I am 'scooped' as well as
criticised. My idea was not, as you seem to feel, aimed at
us, however obliquely. Its genesis was different. I will
write again when I have re-read the story and thought it over
carefully.
Carter did not come last night but I spent a very pleasant
evening with Magda and John. Definitely, however, I shall
see Carter next week. I have another idea for an operetta,
somewhere between Hemingway and Offenbach, in which it is like-
ly that Frank could be interested. That I could write straight.
I think if I can write the proper things I can get work on
TV and Sound. Magda as my agent, in effect.
Your visit to Rye with Beryl sounds enchanting (despite the
behavior of the secretary of the Rye Artists).
My lectures have all gone rather nicely. The discussion at
Hampstead was not too bad: I adopted an existentialist point
of view towards art for the evening, as it was a discussion and I supposed liveliness was expected. I might just as well
not have bothered. Nobody knew what I meant and Dennis and
Freddie only said what they only too obviously believed in.
I have finished the Sutherland-Moore article. I am, at the
moment, terribly pleased with it: I hope I've got Sutherland
exactly. However, I may think differently when I see it in
print next week. Christ but it was a rush.
If I am not to miss the 7.00 collection I must stop now, but
you will get this before the week end if I go now. So, my
darling, my beauty, I love you, I adore you, and am happy that
we shall soon meet. I love love love you
Lawrence
72641988 - Molly_Carr
Balckheath 22-5-53Friday evening
Dearest Sylvia:
Thank you for your story. Written at such speed and promted as it was by negative reactions, I must say I think it is excellent. Especially I like the ways things go on while the characters speak: there is no unreal suspension during speech. YOu have 'caught' them, and the social milieu, very well. I do agree with the Woods, however, that it has not quite been taken to the end. I ought to know: it's my idea.
My feelings are mixed: admiration for wht you have written; rueful at your deflationary speed and crispness. You make me feel my idea was morbid and fancy and that what I had written was over-written (as it well may be). It is odd to see my idea differently handled, so that I am 'scooped' as well as criticised. My idea was not, as you seem to feel, aimed at us, however obliquely.. It's genesis was different. I will write again when I have re-read the story and thought it over carefully.
darter did not come last night but I spent a very pleasant evening with Magda and John. Definitely, however, I shall see Carter next week. I have another idea for an operatta, somewhere between Hemingway and Offenbach, in which it is likedly that Frank could be interested. That I could write straight. I think if I can write the proper things I can get work on TV and Sound. Magda as my agent, in effect.
Your visit to Rye with Beryl sounds enchanting (despite the behavior of the secretary of the Rye Artists).
My lectures have all gone rather nicely. The discussion at Hampstead was not too bad: I adopted an existentialistt point of view towards art for the evening, as it was a discussion and I supposed livliness was expected. I might just as well not have bothered. Nobody knew what I meant and Dennis and Freddie only said what they only too obviously believed in.
I have finished the Sutherland-Moore article. I am, at the moment, terribly pleased with it: I hope I've got Sutherland exactly. However, I may think differently when I see it in print next week. Christ but it was a rush.
If I am not to miss the 7.00 collection I must stop now, but you will get this before the week end if I go now. So, my darling, my beauty, I love you, I adore you, and am happy that we shall soon meet. I love love love you
Lawrence
72698106 - Preacher357
[22-5-53] Friday evening Blackheath Dearest Sylvia:Thank you for your story. Written at such speed and prompted
as it was by negative reactions, I must say I think it is ex-
cellent. Especially I like the ways things go on while the
characters speak: there is no unreal suspension during speech.
You have 'caught' them, and the social milieu, very well. I
do agree with the Woods, however, that it has not quite been
taken to the end. I ought to know: it's my idea.
My feelings are mixed: admiration for what you have written;
rueful at your deflationary speed and crispness. You make me
feel my idea was morbid and fance and that what I had written
was over-written (as it well may be). It is odd to see my
idea differently handled, so that I am 'scooped' as well as
criticised. I idea was not, as you seem to feel, aimed at
us, however obliquely. Its genesis was different. I will
write again when I have re-read the story and thought it over
carefully.
Carter did not come last night but I spent a very pleasant
evening with Magda and John. Definitely, however, I shall
see Carter next week. I have another idea for an operatta,
somewhere between Hemingway and Offenbach, in which it is like-
ly that Frank could be interested. That I could write straight.
I think if I can write the proper thinkgs I can get work on
TV and Sound. Magda as my agent, in effect.
Your visit to Rye with Beryl sounds enchanting (despite the
behavior of the secretary of the Rye Aritsts).
My lectures have all gone rather nicely. The discussion at
Hampstead was not too bad: I adopted an existentialist point
of view towards art for the evening, as it was a discussion
and I supposed livliness was expected. I might just as well
not have bothered. Nobody knew what I meant and Dennis and
Freddie only said what they only too obviously believed in.
I have finished the Sutherland-Moore article. I am, at the
moment, terribly pleased with it: I hope I've got Sutherland
exactly. However, I may think differently when I see it in
print next week. Christ but it was a rush.
If I am not to miss the 7:00 collection I must stop now, but
you will get this before the week end if I go now. So, my
darling, my beauty, I love you, I adore you, and am happy that
we shall soon meet. I love love love you
Lawrence
72761189 - altheist
[22-2-53]Blackheath
Friday evening
Dearest Sylvia:
Thank you for your story. Written at such speed and prompted as it was by negative reactions, I must say I think it is excharacters speak: there is no unreal suspension during speech. You have "caught" them, and the social milieu, very well. I do agree with the Woods, however, that it has not quite been taken to the end. I ought to know: it's my idea.
My feelings are mixed admiration for what you have written; rueful at your deflationary speed and crispness. You make me feel my idea was morbid and fancy and that what I had written was over-written (as it well may be). It is odd to see my criticised. My idea was not, as you seem to feel, aimed at us, however obliquely. Its genesis was different. I will write again when I have re-read the story and thought it over carefully.
Darter did not come last night but I spent a very pleasant evening with Magda and John. Definitely, however, I shall see Carter next week. I have another idea for an operetta, somewhere between Hemingway and Offenbach, in which it is likely that Frank could be interested. That I could write straight. I think if I can write the proper things I can get work on TV and Sound. Magda as my agent, in effect.
Your visit to Rye with Beryl sounds enchanting (despite the behavior of the secretary of the Rye Artists).
My lectures have all gone rather nicely. The discussion at Hampstead was not too bad: I adopted an existentialist point of view towards art for the evening, as it was discussion and I supposed liveliness was expected. I might just as well not have bothered. Nobody knew what I meant and Dennis and Freddie only said what they only too obviously believed in.
I have finish the Sutherland-Moore article. I am, at the moment, terribly pleased with it: I hope I've got Sutherland exactly. However, I may think differently when I see it in print next week. Christ but it was a rush.
If I am not to miss the 7:00 collection I must stop now, but you will get this before the week end if I go now. So, my darling, my beauty, I love you, I adore you, and am so happy that we shall soon meet. I love love love you
Lawrence